+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini Diffusion
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 52.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
4 months newer
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Average Score:80.9%(+52.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:28.9%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Coding73.3%(+50.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Coding22.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
1 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
+
+
+
+
Claude Haiku 4.5
Avg Score:80.9%(+52.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:28.9%
Providers:0