Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads with 7.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers 100.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $69.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Haiku 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5 continues Anthropic's tradition of fast, efficient models in the fourth generation Claude family. Designed to maintain the hallmark speed and cost-effectiveness of the Haiku line while incorporating advancements from the Claude 4 series, it serves applications requiring rapid processing and quick turnaround times.
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
10 months newer

o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
2025-10-15
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Haiku 4.5

o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5

o1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Haiku 4.5

o1
Claude Haiku 4.5
2025-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic

o1

Claude Haiku 4.5

o1

Claude Haiku 4.5

o1
Azure
OpenAI