Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 882.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $87.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
2 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude Opus 4.1

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval