+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5 Codex
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Codex was developed as a specialized variant of GPT-5 optimized for programming and software development tasks. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers with enhanced capabilities for code completion, debugging, translation, and explanation of complex codebases.
1 month newer
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
GPT-5 Codex
OpenAI
2025-09-15
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:74.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 Codex
Average Score:74.5%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Coding74.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 Codex
Coding74.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 Codex
2024-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:74.5%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 Codex
Avg Score:74.5%
Providers:0