+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-5.1 Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5.1 Thinking leads with 1.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1, released by Anthropic in August 2025, is a large language model from the Claude 4 family optimized for demanding reasoning, multi-step coding, and extended analysis tasks. It features a 200K token context window, 32K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking capabilities. Opus 4.1 targets complex problem-solving, multi-turn reasoning workflows, and applications requiring deep analysis with integrated tool use.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5.1 Thinking, released by OpenAI in November 2025, is an extended reasoning variant from the GPT-5.1 family that applies chain-of-thought processing to improve accuracy on complex reasoning, mathematics, and coding tasks. It targets analytical workflows where deliberate reasoning over a problem significantly improves output quality.
2 months newer
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
GPT-5.1 Thinking
OpenAI
2025-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:74.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Average Score:76.3%(+1.8%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Coding74.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Coding76.3%(+1.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Opus 4.1
2025-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
3 providers
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI
+
+
+
+
GPT-5.1 Thinking
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:74.5%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-5.1 Thinking
Avg Score:76.3%(+1.8%)
Providers:0