+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 11.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Llama 4 Maverick is $89.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
4 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($89.23 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+11.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:69.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+11.1%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:69.8%
Providers:7