+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 offers 38.5K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. o1-mini is $75.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
10 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00($75.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+20.9%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:2