Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 13.9% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 68.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. o3 is $40.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 3 providers. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1, released by Anthropic in August 2025, is a large language model from the Claude 4 family optimized for demanding reasoning, multi-step coding, and extended analysis tasks. It features a 200K token context window, 32K maximum output tokens, native image understanding, and extended thinking capabilities. Opus 4.1 targets complex problem-solving, multi-turn reasoning workflows, and applications requiring deep analysis with integrated tool use.
OpenAI
OpenAI o3, released by OpenAI in April 2025, is a large reasoning model that applies extended chain-of-thought processing to deliver improved performance on complex math, science, and coding tasks. It features a 200K token context window and native image understanding, with demonstrated strong results on mathematics and software engineering benchmarks. o3 targets demanding analytical and engineering tasks where deliberate, multi-step reasoning produces significantly better outcomes than direct generation.
3 months newer

o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4.1
o3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4.1
o3
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.1
2025-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI
o3
Claude Opus 4.1
o3
Claude Opus 4.1
o3
o3
OpenAI