Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 8.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 65.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $15.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
6 days newer

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-R1-0528

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita