+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 3.3% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4. Llama 4 Maverick is $17.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
1 month newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($17.23 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:74.9%(+3.3%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:71.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:74.9%(+3.3%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:71.6%
Providers:7