Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 28.0K more tokens in context window than o1. Claude Sonnet 4 is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
5 months newer

o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

o1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4

o1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

o1

Claude Sonnet 4

o1

o1
Azure
OpenAI