Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval