+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini Diffusion
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 53.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion was developed as a specialized model for image generation, designed to create high-quality visual content through diffusion-based techniques. Built to complement the text and multimodal capabilities of the Gemini family, it extends Google's AI capabilities into creative visual generation tasks.
4 months newer
Gemini Diffusion
2025-05-20
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:82.5%(+53.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Average Score:28.9%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Coding77.2%(+54.3%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Coding22.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:82.5%(+53.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemini Diffusion
Avg Score:28.9%
Providers:0