Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 15.7% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 36.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
9 months newer

o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

o1

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o1
o1
Azure
OpenAI