Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 2.9% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 36.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. o3 is $8.00 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
5 months newer

o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3
o3
2024-05-31
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3
o3
OpenAI