Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 25.1% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 36.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. o3-mini is $12.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
8 months newer

o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3-mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3-mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3-mini
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3-mini

Claude Sonnet 4.5

o3-mini
o3-mini
Azure
OpenAI