Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 9.9% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers 123.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is $14.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
2 months newer

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Novita