+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Minimax M 2.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude Sonnet 4.6 offers 59.9K more tokens in context window than Minimax M 2.5. Minimax M 2.5 is $16.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is a general-purpose language model from Anthropic, released in February 2026 as an update to the Sonnet 4 line that introduced adaptive thinking — a mode where the model automatically calibrates its reasoning depth based on task complexity rather than requiring manual configuration by the developer. The model accepts text and image inputs and integrates natively with web search and code execution tools, consolidating capabilities that previously required separate toolchain setup into a unified API surface. It became the primary workhorse model in the Claude 4 series for code assistance, agentic pipelines, and retrieval-augmented applications that benefit from built-in web access.
+
+
+
+
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.5 is a large language model from MiniMax extensively trained with reinforcement learning across hundreds of thousands of complex real-world environments. It targets agentic tool use, coding automation, and office productivity tasks, with strong results on software engineering and web browsing benchmarks. M2.5 represents the next generation of MiniMax's M-series models optimized for production agentic workloads.
4 days newer
Minimax M 2.5
MiniMax
2026-02-13
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic
2026-02-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Minimax M 2.5
Input:$0.30
Output:$1.20($16.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Average Score:79.6%
+
+
+
+
Minimax M 2.5
Average Score:80.2%(+0.6%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Coding79.6%
+
+
+
+
Minimax M 2.5
Coding80.2%(+0.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6
2025-08
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
3 providers
Anthropic
AWS Bedrock
Google Cloud Vertex AI
+
+
+
+
Minimax M 2.5
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Avg Score:79.6%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Minimax M 2.5
Avg Score:80.2%(+0.6%)
Providers:1