+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Codestral-22B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 24.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.9% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEvalFIM-Average (91.6%), HumanEval (81.1%), MBPP (78.2%). Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
2024-05-29
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Average Score:24.3%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:49.1%(+24.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Codestral-22B
Avg Score:24.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:49.1%(+24.8%)
Providers:7