Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 38.4% higher average benchmark score. Command R+ offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 23 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU-Redux (92.5%), IFEval (88.9%), AIME 2025 (87.8%). It supports a 131K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Command R+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
Command R+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Available providers and their performance metrics
Command R+
Bedrock
Cohere
Command R+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Command R+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita