+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. DeepSeek-R1 is available on 5 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1 was developed as a reasoning-focused language model, designed to combine chain-of-thought reasoning with reinforcement learning techniques. Built to excel at complex problem-solving through trial-and-error learning and deliberate analytical processes, it demonstrates the power of efficient training methods in open-source model development.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
4 months newer
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek
2025-01-20
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Input:$0.55
Output:$2.19($0.06 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
5 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 0.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
DeepSeek
Throughput: 9 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Fireworks
Throughput: 2.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Together
Throughput: 4 tok/s
Latency: 0.6ms
ZeroEval
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-R1
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2