+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.2 vs GLM 5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM 5 leads with 4.6% higher average benchmark score. GLM 5 offers 68.1K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.2. DeepSeek-V3.2 is $1.99 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2, released by DeepSeek on December 1, 2025, is a large language model with 685 billion total parameters featuring integrated thinking in tool-use and support for both reasoning and direct generation modes. It features a 128K token context window and introduced large-scale agent training across 1,800+ environments. DeepSeek-V3.2 targets agentic workflows, complex instruction following, and coding tasks under an open MIT license.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-5 is a large language model from Zhipu AI with 745 billion total parameters and 44 billion active parameters per inference, designed for agentic intelligence, advanced reasoning, and frontier-level performance. It features a 200K token context window and targets complex multi-step tasks requiring sustained reasoning and tool use. GLM-5 is available via Zhipu AI's Z.ai platform under an MIT license.
2 months newer
DeepSeek-V3.2
DeepSeek
2025-12-01
GLM 5
Zhipu AI
2026-02-11
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.10($1.99 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GLM 5
Input:$0.80
Output:$2.56
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2
Average Score:37.5%
+
+
+
+
GLM 5
Average Score:42.1%(+4.6%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2
Coding37.5%
+
+
+
+
GLM 5
Coding42.1%(+4.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2
1 providers
DeepSeek
+
+
+
+
GLM 5
1 providers
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.2
Avg Score:37.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM 5
Avg Score:42.1%(+4.6%)
Providers:1