+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs QwQ-32B-Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 262.1K more tokens in context window than QwQ-32B-Preview. QwQ-32B-Preview is $0.92 cheaper per million tokens. QwQ-32B-Preview is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B Preview was introduced as an early access version of the QwQ reasoning model, designed to allow researchers and developers to experiment with advanced analytical capabilities. Built to gather feedback on reasoning-enhanced architecture, it represents an experimental step toward more thoughtful language models.
1 month newer
QwQ-32B-Preview
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-11-28
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Input:$0.27
Output:$1.00
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.20($0.92 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Average Score:65.9%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Average Score:55.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B-Preview
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
2 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek-V3.1
Avg Score:65.9%(+10.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B-Preview
Avg Score:55.1%
Providers:4