Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $2.26 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT OSS 120B
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT OSS 120B
Gemini 2.5 Flash
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval