+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 20.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 978.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $9.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
9 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($9.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:81.3%(+20.2%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:61.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:81.3%(+20.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:61.1%
Providers:1