+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Behemoth
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 804.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 4 Behemoth. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $5.25 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Google DeepMind
Gemini 2.5 Flash, released by Google in June 2025, is a large language model from the Gemini 2.5 family optimized for high-throughput, cost-efficient deployments with multimodal reasoning. It features a 1M token context window, hybrid thinking control, and native support for text, image, video, and audio input. Gemini 2.5 Flash targets latency-sensitive applications, document analysis, and high-volume API workloads that benefit from combined reasoning and generation in a single model.
+
+
+
+
Meta AI
Llama 4 Behemoth is a research-scale Mixture-of-Experts language model with approximately 2 trillion total parameters (288 billion active per inference), developed by Meta as a teacher model for the Llama 4 family. Available only in limited preview, it serves as the knowledge distillation source for Llama 4 Scout and Maverick. Behemoth targets research applications requiring the largest-scale open-weight model architecture from the Llama 4 generation.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google DeepMind
2025-06-17
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($5.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Behemoth
Input:$3.00
Output:$3.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:-1.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Behemoth
Average Score:-1.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Google Cloud Vertex AI
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Behemoth
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:-1.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Behemoth
Avg Score:-1.0%
Providers:1