+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 2.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 978.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-3. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
3 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00($6.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:84.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:87.3%(+2.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:84.4%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:87.3%(+2.9%)
Providers:1