+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 11.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro was developed as Google's most intelligent AI model, designed to comprehend vast datasets and challenging problems from diverse information sources including text, audio, images, and video. Built to handle complex reasoning and multi-step problem solving, it represents Google's flagship offering for enterprise and advanced applications.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00($6.75 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Average Score:47.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:58.8%(+11.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Avg Score:47.2%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:58.8%(+11.6%)
Providers:2