+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 27B vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 28.8% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
24 days newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.08 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 31 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:54.9%(+28.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:26.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Novita
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:54.9%(+28.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:26.0%
Providers:6