+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:63.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:70.2%(+6.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:63.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:70.2%(+6.6%)
Providers:0