+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads with 6.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:53.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:59.6%(+6.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:53.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:59.6%(+6.1%)
Providers:0