+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 12.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 76.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.6%), HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (87.5%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:42.6%(+12.0%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:30.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:42.6%(+12.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:30.6%
Providers:1