+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 26.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-3 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 85.7% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2024 (93.3%), GPQA (84.6%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:53.2%(+26.4%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:26.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:53.2%(+26.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:26.8%
Providers:1