+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
5 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:86.7%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:86.7%(+8.4%)
Providers:1