+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 3.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:35.5%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:38.9%(+3.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:35.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:38.9%(+3.4%)
Providers:7