+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5V vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5V. Llama 4 Maverick is $2.03 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5V was developed as a vision-language variant, designed to understand and reason about both images and text in Chinese and English. Built to extend Zhipu AI's multilingual capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual understanding alongside bilingual language processing.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
4 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
GLM-4.5V
Zhipu AI
2025-08-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.20
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($2.03 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
2 providers
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5V
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:7