+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 22.9% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 offers 52.2K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. GLM-4.6 is $9.90 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
1 year newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($9.90 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:74.5%(+22.9%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:51.6%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%(+34.8%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Coding33.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:74.5%(+22.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:51.6%
Providers:2