+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 1.5% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.6 offers 60.6K more tokens in context window than Grok-3. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
7 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($15.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:87.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:88.9%(+1.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:87.5%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:88.9%(+1.5%)
Providers:1