+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. GLM-4.6 offers 60.6K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Grok-3 Mini is $1.80 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
7 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50($1.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:87.5%(+0.0%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:87.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:87.5%(+0.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:87.4%
Providers:1