+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. Llama 4 Maverick is $1.83 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
5 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($1.83 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:81.0%(+11.2%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:69.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:81.0%(+11.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:69.8%
Providers:7