+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick offers 800.0K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6, released by Zhipu AI in September 2025, is a large language model with approximately 357 billion parameters from the GLM-4 family, featuring an expanded 200K token context window. It supports strong mathematical reasoning, coding, and agentic orchestration tasks. GLM-4.6 targets enterprise-ready open-source deployments under an MIT license, with availability through Zhipu AI's Z.ai platform.
+
+
+
+
Meta AI
Llama 4 Maverick, released by Meta on April 5, 2025, is a natively multimodal Mixture-of-Experts large language model with 400 billion total parameters and 17 billion active parameters per inference. It features a 1M token context window and supports text and image input, enabling strong performance on both language and vision tasks. Maverick targets open-source deployments requiring large-scale multimodal reasoning, released under Meta's custom license.
5 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta AI
2025-04-05
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.18
Output:$0.18($0.04 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
1 providers
Zhipu AI
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
1 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:1