+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 9.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 944.3K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. GPT-4.1 nano is $11.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
8 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($11.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:60.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:69.7%(+9.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:60.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:69.7%(+9.2%)
Providers:1