+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4.1 nano vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 50.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 944.3K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
1 month newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($0.30 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:39.8%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:89.9%(+50.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
Latency: 2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:39.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:89.9%(+50.1%)
Providers:1