+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT-4o vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 5.3% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini offers 49.2K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o. GPT-4o is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
1 month newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00($2.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:77.9%(+5.3%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:72.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
2 providers
Azure
Throughput: 99 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms
OpenAI
Throughput: 132 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:77.9%(+5.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:72.6%
Providers:2