+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GPT OSS 120B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 7.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
4 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45($0.23 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:85.0%(+7.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:77.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
Groq
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Novita
OpenAI
Throughput: 115 tok/s
Latency: 5.2ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 500 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:85.0%(+7.4%)
Providers:5
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:77.6%
Providers:7