+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini offers 57.5K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Grok-2 is $3.00 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-2 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 76.5% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.6%), HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (87.5%). It supports a 136K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00($3.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:55.7%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:39.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:55.7%(+16.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:39.2%
Providers:2