+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-2 vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 14.1% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 164.0K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. o3-mini is $6.50 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
5 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40($6.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:73.2%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:87.3%(+14.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:73.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:87.3%(+14.1%)
Providers:2