+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 25.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.9M more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
1 month newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60($0.03 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:82.2%(+25.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:56.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:82.2%(+25.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:56.6%
Providers:7