+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 Mini vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 24.0% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini offers 57.5K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Grok-3 Mini is $14.20 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-3 Mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
5 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50($14.20 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:84.0%(+24.0%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:84.0%(+24.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:2