+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Grok-3 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 24.6% higher average benchmark score. o1-mini offers 57.5K more tokens in context window than Grok-3. o1-mini is $3.00 cheaper per million tokens. Grok-3 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
5 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00($3.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:84.6%(+24.6%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:60.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:84.6%(+24.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:60.0%
Providers:2