Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers 124.9K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B Thinking was developed as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the large-scale Qwen3 architecture. Built to combine deliberate analytical processing with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves tasks requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
14 days newer

Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-07-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Kimi K2 Instruct

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks

Kimi K2 Instruct

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Available providers and their performance metrics

Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Kimi K2 Instruct

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Kimi K2 Instruct

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Novita